You are currently browsing the tag archive for the 'PVA' tag.
There are 2 standard methods of translating an account, PVA and VAL.
PVA:
VAL:
An example of PVA and VAL is as follows:
PVA
|
|
JAN |
FEB |
MAR |
(Divide) |
|
AVERAGE RATE.FRANCS |
0.5 |
0.6 |
0.7 |
|
|
INCOME ACCT (EURO) |
100 |
300 |
600 |
(YTD Amounts) |
|
INCOME ACCT (USD) |
200 |
533 |
962 |
(Translated Amt |
The PVA method takes the periodic value in the INCOME ACCT and divides that by the exchange rate for that period. It then adds this result to the translated value from the prior period. It does not change the exchange rate amount or look to the prior period for the exchange rate at all. In the example above the calculations are as follows:
JAN 100 / 0.5 = 200
FEB (300 – 100) = 200 / 0.6 = 333 + 200 (JAN) = 533
MAR (600 – 300) = 300 / 0.7 = 429 + 533 = 962
VAL
|
|
JAN |
FEB |
MAR |
(Divide) |
|
AVERAGE RATE.FRANCS |
0.5 |
0.6 |
0.7 |
|
|
INCOME ACCT (EURO) |
100 |
300 |
600 |
(YTD Amounts) |
|
INCOME ACCT (USD) |
200 |
500 |
857 |
(Translated Amt |
Using the VAL method instead of PVA, the results would be:
JAN 100 / 0.5 = 200
FEB 300 / 0.6 = 500
MAR 600 / 0.7 = 857
Contributed by:
Peter Fugere, Practice Director
HFM & HE Hyperion Certified
Ranzal & Associates
pfugere@ranzal.com
